[PATCH] xfstests: 311: fsck the dmflakey device instead of the real device V2

Josef Bacik jbacik at fusionio.com
Thu May 16 15:30:35 CDT 2013


On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 08:04:20AM -0600, Rich Johnston wrote:
> On 05/15/2013 10:20 AM, Josef Bacik wrote:
> > Dave pointed out that xfs was having issues with 311 because of caching issues.
> > He suggested that I fsck the dm-flakey device to make sure we don't have this
> > problem.  Make _check_scratch_fs take an optional argument to use as the device
> > to fsck.  Thanks,
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik at fusionio.com>
> > ---
> Hi Josef,
> 
> Looks like it fails test 19 , are we supposed to see failures for ext4 
> and xfs?
> 

Yeah that's what I was seeing, if you run the fsync tester without the reboot
option and look at the file itself it should match the md5sum thats in the good
output.  Thanks,

Josef



More information about the xfs mailing list