Announce re-factor all current xfstests patches request
Dave Chinner
david at fromorbit.com
Wed Mar 27 15:54:07 CDT 2013
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 09:46:06AM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 08:23:07AM -0500, Rich Johnston wrote:
> > All xfstest developers,
> >
> > Thanks again for all your time in submitting and reviewing patches
> > for xfstests. The latest patchset posted here:
> >
> > http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2013-03/msg00467.html
> >
> > requires all current patches to be re-factored.
>
> Given that we are now segregating patches into subdirectories, is it
> correct in the future tests should be named descriptively, instead of
> using 3 digit NNN numbers (which has been a major pain from a central
> assignment perspective)?
Support for named tests have not yet been added. From the check
script:
SUPPORTED_TESTS="[0-9][0-9][0-9] [0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9]"
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david at fromorbit.com
More information about the xfs
mailing list