[PATCH v9 2/6] xfs: Remove incore use of XFS_OQUOTA_ENFD and XFS_OQUOTA_CHKD
Dave Chinner
david at fromorbit.com
Mon Jun 24 00:59:21 CDT 2013
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 09:48:23PM -0500, Chandra Seetharaman wrote:
> Remove all incore use of XFS_OQUOTA_ENFD and XFS_OQUOTA_CHKD. Instead,
> start using XFS_GQUOTA_.* XFS_PQUOTA_.* counterparts for GQUOTA and
> PQUOTA respectively.
>
> On-disk copy still uses XFS_OQUOTA_ENFD and XFS_OQUOTA_CHKD.
>
> Read and write of the superblock does the conversion from *OQUOTA*
> to *[PG]QUOTA*.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chandra Seetharaman <sekharan at us.ibm.com>
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> fs/xfs/xfs_qm.c | 9 ++++++---
> fs/xfs/xfs_qm_syscalls.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> fs/xfs/xfs_quota.h | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> fs/xfs/xfs_quotaops.c | 6 ++++--
> fs/xfs/xfs_super.c | 16 ++++++++--------
> fs/xfs/xfs_trans_dquot.c | 4 ++--
> 7 files changed, 115 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c
> index 6a19434..e2e14cb 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c
> @@ -336,6 +336,14 @@ xfs_mount_validate_sb(
> return XFS_ERROR(EWRONGFS);
> }
>
> + if ((sbp->sb_qflags & (XFS_OQUOTA_ENFD | XFS_OQUOTA_CHKD)) &&
> + (sbp->sb_qflags & (XFS_PQUOTA_ENFD | XFS_GQUOTA_ENFD |
> + XFS_PQUOTA_CHKD | XFS_GQUOTA_CHKD))) {
> + xfs_notice(mp,
> +"Super block has XFS_OQUOTA bits along with XFS_PQUOTA and/or XFS_GQUOTA bits.\n");
> + return XFS_ERROR(EFSCORRUPTED);
> + }
> +
> /*
> * Version 5 superblock feature mask validation. Reject combinations the
> * kernel cannot support up front before checking anything else. For
> @@ -622,6 +630,35 @@ xfs_sb_from_disk(
> to->sb_lsn = be64_to_cpu(from->sb_lsn);
> }
>
> +static inline void
> +xfs_handle_quota_to_disk(
> + xfs_dsb_t *to,
> + xfs_sb_t *from,
> + __int64_t *fields)
An "XFS handle" has meaning in the namespace (i.e. an XFS filehandle
as used in xfs_ioctl.c and defined in xfs_fs.h, so this is not a
good name.
Realistically, xfs_sb_qflags_to_disk() is more appropriate for it's
function....
> @@ -643,6 +680,7 @@ xfs_sb_to_disk(
> if (!fields)
> return;
>
> + xfs_handle_quota_to_disk(to, from, &fields);
> while (fields) {
> f = (xfs_sb_field_t)xfs_lowbit64((__uint64_t)fields);
> first = xfs_sb_info[f].offset;
> @@ -835,6 +873,14 @@ reread:
> */
> xfs_sb_from_disk(&mp->m_sb, XFS_BUF_TO_SBP(bp));
>
> + if (sbp->sb_qflags & XFS_OQUOTA_ENFD)
> + sbp->sb_qflags |= (sbp->sb_qflags & XFS_PQUOTA_ACCT) ?
> + XFS_PQUOTA_ENFD : XFS_GQUOTA_ENFD;
> + if (sbp->sb_qflags & XFS_OQUOTA_CHKD)
> + sbp->sb_qflags |= (sbp->sb_qflags & XFS_PQUOTA_ACCT) ?
> + XFS_PQUOTA_CHKD : XFS_GQUOTA_CHKD;
> + sbp->sb_qflags &= ~(XFS_OQUOTA_ENFD | XFS_OQUOTA_CHKD);
and that as xfs_sb_qflags_from_disk()....
> +
> /*
> * We must be able to do sector-sized and sector-aligned IO.
> */
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_qm.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_qm.c
> index f5f9925..de7ecbd 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_qm.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_qm.c
> @@ -299,8 +299,10 @@ xfs_qm_mount_quotas(
> */
> if (!XFS_IS_UQUOTA_ON(mp))
> mp->m_qflags &= ~XFS_UQUOTA_CHKD;
> - if (!(XFS_IS_GQUOTA_ON(mp) || XFS_IS_PQUOTA_ON(mp)))
> - mp->m_qflags &= ~XFS_OQUOTA_CHKD;
> + if (!XFS_IS_GQUOTA_ON(mp))
> + mp->m_qflags &= ~XFS_GQUOTA_CHKD;
> + if (!XFS_IS_PQUOTA_ON(mp))
> + mp->m_qflags &= ~XFS_PQUOTA_CHKD;
Order is user, group, project in the processing....
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_qm_syscalls.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_qm_syscalls.c
> index b03b2ab..5e51227 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_qm_syscalls.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_qm_syscalls.c
> @@ -117,11 +117,11 @@ xfs_qm_scall_quotaoff(
> }
> if (flags & XFS_GQUOTA_ACCT) {
> dqtype |= XFS_QMOPT_GQUOTA;
> - flags |= (XFS_OQUOTA_CHKD | XFS_OQUOTA_ENFD);
> + flags |= (XFS_GQUOTA_CHKD | XFS_GQUOTA_ENFD);
> inactivate_flags |= XFS_GQUOTA_ACTIVE;
> } else if (flags & XFS_PQUOTA_ACCT) {
> dqtype |= XFS_QMOPT_PQUOTA;
> - flags |= (XFS_OQUOTA_CHKD | XFS_OQUOTA_ENFD);
> + flags |= (XFS_PQUOTA_CHKD | XFS_PQUOTA_ENFD);
> inactivate_flags |= XFS_PQUOTA_ACTIVE;
> }
Again, u/g/p order...
>
> @@ -335,14 +335,14 @@ xfs_qm_scall_quotaon(
> * quota acct on ondisk without m_qflags' knowing.
> */
> if (((flags & XFS_UQUOTA_ACCT) == 0 &&
> - (mp->m_sb.sb_qflags & XFS_UQUOTA_ACCT) == 0 &&
> - (flags & XFS_UQUOTA_ENFD))
> - ||
> + (mp->m_sb.sb_qflags & XFS_UQUOTA_ACCT) == 0 &&
> + (flags & XFS_UQUOTA_ENFD)) ||
> ((flags & XFS_PQUOTA_ACCT) == 0 &&
> - (mp->m_sb.sb_qflags & XFS_PQUOTA_ACCT) == 0 &&
> - (flags & XFS_GQUOTA_ACCT) == 0 &&
> - (mp->m_sb.sb_qflags & XFS_GQUOTA_ACCT) == 0 &&
> - (flags & XFS_OQUOTA_ENFD))) {
> + (mp->m_sb.sb_qflags & XFS_PQUOTA_ACCT) == 0 &&
> + (flags & XFS_PQUOTA_ENFD)) ||
> + ((flags & XFS_GQUOTA_ACCT) == 0 &&
> + (mp->m_sb.sb_qflags & XFS_GQUOTA_ACCT) == 0 &&
> + (flags & XFS_GQUOTA_ENFD))) {
> xfs_debug(mp,
> "%s: Can't enforce without acct, flags=%x sbflags=%x\n",
> __func__, flags, mp->m_sb.sb_qflags);
And now u/p/g order. That's a little confusing - let's try to keep
the ordering the same throughout the code...
> @@ -776,9 +776,12 @@ xfs_qm_scall_getquota(
> * gets turned off. No need to confuse the user level code,
> * so return zeroes in that case.
> */
> - if ((!XFS_IS_UQUOTA_ENFORCED(mp) && dqp->q_core.d_flags == XFS_DQ_USER) ||
> - (!XFS_IS_OQUOTA_ENFORCED(mp) &&
> - (dqp->q_core.d_flags & (XFS_DQ_PROJ | XFS_DQ_GROUP)))) {
> + if ((!XFS_IS_UQUOTA_ENFORCED(mp) &&
> + dqp->q_core.d_flags == XFS_DQ_USER) ||
> + (!XFS_IS_PQUOTA_ENFORCED(mp) &&
> + dqp->q_core.d_flags == XFS_DQ_PROJ) ||
> + (!XFS_IS_GQUOTA_ENFORCED(mp) &&
> + dqp->q_core.d_flags == XFS_DQ_GROUP)) {
> dst->d_btimer = 0;
> dst->d_itimer = 0;
> dst->d_rtbtimer = 0;
Same here - it's u/p/g order rather than u/g/p. Can you fix up all
the other cases so they are all in the same u/g/p order?
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_quota.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_quota.h
> index c38068f..0596860 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_quota.h
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_quota.h
> @@ -161,28 +161,43 @@ typedef struct xfs_qoff_logformat {
> #define XFS_GQUOTA_ACCT 0x0040 /* group quota accounting ON */
>
> /*
> + * Start differentiating group quota and project quota using
> + * distinct flags, instead of using the combined OQUOTA flags.
> + *
> + * Conversion to and from the combined OQUOTA flag (if necessary)
> + * is done only in xfs_readsb() and xfs_sb_to_disk()
Try to describe the meaning of the flags, not the process you are
using to change the code. Hence I think, only the second paragraph
is needed here. Also, based on my comments above, conversion is
done in xfs_sb_qflags_to_disk() and xfs_sb_qflags_from_disk()....
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david at fromorbit.com
More information about the xfs
mailing list