[PATCH 44/49] xfs: Reduce allocations during CIL insertion

Mark Tinguely tinguely at sgi.com
Fri Jul 26 16:06:37 CDT 2013


On 07/26/13 15:46, Michael L. Semon wrote:
> On 07/24/2013 09:28 AM, Mark Tinguely wrote:
>> On 07/23/13 16:44, Michael L. Semon wrote:
>>> On 07/23/2013 05:15 PM, Mark Tinguely wrote:
>>>> On 07/19/13 01:25, Dave Chinner wrote:
>>>>> From: Dave Chinner<dchinner at redhat.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> Now that we have the size of the object before the formatting pass
>>>>> is called, we can allocation the log vector and it's buffer in a
>>>>> single allocation rather than two separate allocations.
>>>>>
>>>>> Store the size of the allocated buffer in the log vector so that
>>>>> we potentially avoid allocation for future modifications of the
>>>>> object.
>>>>>
>>>>> While touching this code, remove the IOP_FORMAT definition.
>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner<dchinner at redhat.com>
>>>>
>>>> Looks good.
>>>>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Mark Tinguely<tinguely at sgi.com>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> xfs mailing list
>>>> xfs at oss.sgi.com
>>>> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
>>>
>>> I'd like to register a gentle "test this well" protest on this patch.
>>> While trying to figure out the origin of an unrelated lockdep, I
>>> tried to copy 3 kernel gits from one 2k non-CRC XFS filesystem to
>>> another one.  With at least this patch used, the cp operatin stops,
>>> leading to not-umountable, not-syncable filesystems.  It might be
>>> while copying the 2nd git, or the 3rd git, while copying header files,
>>> or while copying those large *.pack files, but it will happen
>>> somewhere.
>>>
>>> A bisect of the issue ends on this patch, but its removal means that
>>> 45_49 and 46_49 cannot be applied without good knowledge of the code
>>> to be patched.
>>>
>>> This one's on me for not being able to get good information to Dave.
>>> If I can find a way to get trace-cmd to pipe over ssh or something
>>> like that, then maybe there's a chance to make a file that `trace-cmd
>>> report` can read.  Previous attempts to save to different filesystems
>>> or save over NFS and CIFS have all failed.  Will keep trying...
>>>
>>> For diagnosing this patch, is there an effective trace that is rather
>>> small?  And would you need more than just the XFS events?
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> Michael
>>>
>>
>> Thanks for the heads up.
>>
>> If you could please redo the test and get the stack traces with /proc/sysrq-trigger and if you kernel works with crash, a core dump. For the stack trace, I mostly want to know if it has several "xlog_grant_head_wait" entries in it, because ...
>>
>> ...I seemed to have triggered a couple log space reservation hangs with fsstress one XFS partition and a mega-copy on another partition, but will have to graft the new XFS tree onto a Linux 3.10 kernel to get crash (and one of my sata controllers) to work again.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> --Mark.
>
> Well, I tried.  Here's a Google Drive link, and hopefully it works:
>
> https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0B41268QKoNjtckwzVTJqWnIydEE
>
> The instructions in Documentation/kdump/kdump.txt were followed
> fairly well.  The dump was taken from /proc/vmcore and extracted
> like this:
>
> $ cat /proc/vmcore | gzip -9vc>  4git-cp-kernel-dump-1.gz
>
> You seem to have things well under control, so it all might not be
> needed, anyway.  It does mean that kernel core dumps will go more
> quickly next time.
>
> BTW, there's a "crash" program referenced in kdump.txt, and it's been
> downloaded but not built yet.  Were you looking for output from the
> crash program?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Michael

Thanks more data. I will take a look. I will need the vmlinux, 
System.map, and xfs.ko (if xfs is a module).

I can reproduce a problem in patch 44 too. It takes my copy test 20 
minutes to deplete the log space with patch 44, Same test with patch 43 
has been running a day and a half. I do not think that patch 44 is 100 
times faster than patch 43 but I will let patch 43 spin all weekend on a 
couple machines to verify that patch 43 does not hang.

Whatever the cause, it has to be fixed before bringing in patches 43-47.

--Mark.



More information about the xfs mailing list