[PATCH V2] xfstests: generic/313, test sgid inheritance on subdirs
Carlos Maiolino
cmaiolino at redhat.com
Thu Jul 11 12:53:16 CDT 2013
On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 04:51:51PM -0500, Ben Myers wrote:
> Hey Carlos & Eric,
>
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 04:23:20PM -0300, Carlos Maiolino wrote:
> > I'm personally working on this bug with Eric, and the test properly trigger the
> > bug on 100% of the test runs, but, it should also ensure that
> > `irix_sgid_inherit` sysctl is set to 0, if not, the test will fail.
> >
> > follow is a suggestion for a better changelog:
> >
> > Tests if subdirectories created on the filesystem will properly inherit sgid bit
> > when this is set on the parent directory, once the process has the properly
> > permissions to create a subdirectory, this, should inherit parent's sgid bit if
> > this is set and irix_sgid_inherit sysctl is disabled.
>
> I applied this and tested with Carlos's latest patch:
>
> generic/313 - output mismatch (see /root/xfstests/results/generic/313.out.bad)
> --- tests/generic/313.out 2013-07-08 16:27:41.787710646 -0500
> +++ /root/xfstests/results/generic/313.out.bad 2013-07-08 16:47:46.052683735 -0500
> @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
> QA output created by 313
> -drwxr-sr-x. TEST_DIR/313-dir/subdir
> +drwxr-sr-x TEST_DIR/313-dir/subdir
> drwxrwsr-x+ TEST_DIR/313-dir/subdir2
> ...
> (Run 'diff -u tests/generic/313.out /root/xfstests/results/generic/313.out.bad' to see the entire diff)
>
> Looks like there could be a problem with ls? Have you seen that?
>
> Thanks,
> Ben
>
Actually I don't think this is a problem, but the way newer `ls` versions are
displaying the object permissions (the 'dot' at the end of the permissions,
indicating there are no extra attributes).
I'm going to take a look on what's going on, but I still believe it's just a
matter of add the 'dot' to the xfstests correct output.
I had this same problem when testing my patch and needed to fix it locally, but
missed to warn you guys, my apologies
--
Carlos
More information about the xfs
mailing list