[PATCH] MAINTAINERS: xfs at oss.sgi.com is a list

Dave Chinner david at fromorbit.com
Wed Jul 3 04:50:50 CDT 2013


On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 11:36:39AM +0200, Yann Droneaud wrote:
> Le 03.07.2013 11:24, Dave Chinner a écrit :
> >On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 10:14:41AM +0200, Yann Droneaud wrote:
> >>Le 03.07.2013 08:40, Dave Chinner a écrit :
> >>>On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 05:00:47PM +0200, Yann Droneaud wrote:
> >>>>This patch changes type of xfs at oss.sgi.com
> >>>>
> >>>>The output of ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl is
> >>>>modified to report xfs at oss.sgi.com as a list:
> >>>
> >>>What's the problem with that? All XFS patches and problem
> >>>reports should be sent to the xfs at oss.sgi.com list. There are far
> >>>more people than just the maintainer that can triage problems,
> >>>answer questions and review patches...
> >>>
> >>
> >>It was just disturbing: I was looking for a list for XFS
> >>and found only maintainers.
> >
> >That's what the:
> >
> >L:      xfs at oss.sgi.com
> >
> >entry is, yes?
> >
> 
> In the output of ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl:
> 
> Ben Myers <bpm at sgi.com> (supporter:XFS FILESYSTEM)
> Alex Elder <elder at kernel.org> (supporter:XFS FILESYSTEM)
> xfs at oss.sgi.com (supporter:XFS FILESYSTEM)
> linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org (open list)

You're smarter than a dumb script. If the information that the
script parses is correct and the dumb script doesn't give you the
right information, then what needs fixing?

Seriously, all you are proving is the old adage that
scripts/get_maintainer.pl should be considered harmful because
people use it without first engaging their brain.

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david at fromorbit.com



More information about the xfs mailing list