[PATCH 2/5] xfs: always take the iolock around xfs_setattr_size

[Mark Tinguely]

On 12/08/12 06:08, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> There is no reason to conditionally take the iolock inside xfs_setattr_size
> when we can let the caller handle it unconditionally, which just incrases
> the lock hold time for the case where it was previously taken internally
> by a few instructions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig<hch at lst.de>
>
> ---
>   fs/xfs/xfs_file.c     |    2 +-
>   fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c     |   28 +++++++++++++++-------------
>   fs/xfs/xfs_vnodeops.c |    3 +--
>   fs/xfs/xfs_vnodeops.h |    2 +-
>   4 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

looks good

Reviewed-by: Mark Tinguely <tinguely at sgi.com>