[PATCH] xfs: require 64-bit sector_t
Ben Myers
bpm at sgi.com
Mon Dec 16 16:15:59 CST 2013
Hey Christoph,
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 08:46:03AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Trying to support tiny disks only and saving a bit memory might have
> made sense on an SGI O2 15 years ago, but is pretty pointless today.
>
> Remove the rarely tested codepath that uses various smaller in-memory
> types to reduce our test matrix and make the codebase a little bit
> smaller and less complicated.
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de>
This looks ok to me. I'm not seeing much downside to removing the smaller
in-memory types.
Reviewed-by: Ben Myers <bpm at sgi.com>
Thanks,
Ben
More information about the xfs
mailing list