higher agcount on LVM2 thinp volumes
Chris Murphy
lists at colorremedies.com
Fri Aug 30 12:55:50 CDT 2013
On Aug 29, 2013, at 9:38 PM, Dave Chinner <david at fromorbit.com> wrote:
>
> So, what dm-thinp is trying to tell us is that the minimum
> *physical* IO size is 512 bytes (i.e. /sys/.../physical_block_size)
> but the efficient IO size is 256k. So dm-thinp is exposing the
> information incorrectly. What it shoul dbe doing is setting both the
> minimum_io_size and the optimal_io_size to the same value of 256k…
Should I file a bug? Against lvm2?
Chris Murphy
More information about the xfs
mailing list