[PATCH 07/12] xfs: fix the comment of xfs_iroot_realloc()

Mark Tinguely tinguely at sgi.com
Wed Aug 7 09:30:02 CDT 2013


On 08/07/13 09:01, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 9:29 PM, Mark Tinguely<tinguely at sgi.com>  wrote:
>> On 08/07/13 05:11, zwu.kernel at gmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>> From: Zhi Yong Wu<wuzhy at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Zhi Yong Wu<wuzhy at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>> ---
>>>    fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c | 2 +-
>>>    1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
>>> index bb262c2..ccca9cd 100644
>>> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
>>> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
>>> @@ -2103,7 +2103,7 @@ xfs_ifree(
>>>     *
>>>     * The caller must not request to add more records than would fit in
>>>     * the on-disk inode root.  If the if_broot is currently NULL, then
>>> - * if we adding records one will be allocated.  The caller must also
>>> + * if we are adding records, one will be allocated.  The caller must also
>>>     * not request that the number of records go below zero, although
>>>     * it can go to zero.
>>>     *
>>
>>
>>
>> Change this to xfs_inode_fork.c and the series will apply on top of Dave's
>> "current patch queue for Linux 3.12":
> Do you mean that you have done this or i need to do this? If i need to do this,
> can you let me know where i can get xfs git repo which has applied
> Dave's patchset?
>
>>
>>    http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2013-07/msg00411.html


If approved, we can make the change on commit.

The patches look okay to me.

--Mark.



More information about the xfs mailing list