[PATCH] xfs: shutdown filesystem if xfs_perag_get fails
Mark Tinguely
tinguely at sgi.com
Tue Apr 23 08:48:01 CDT 2013
On 04/22/13 18:30, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 10:11:39AM -0500, Mark Tinguely wrote:
>> #6 [ffff880135603980] _xfs_buf_find at ffffffffa01a7fef [xfs]
>> #7 [ffff8801356039f0] xfs_buf_get at ffffffffa01a824a [xfs]
>> #8 [ffff880135603a30] xfs_buf_read at ffffffffa01a83a4 [xfs]
>> #9 [ffff880135603a60] xlog_recover_inode_pass2 at ffffffffa0193629 [xfs]
>
> So it's the same problem as this bug fix addresses:
>
> commit 10616b806d1d7835b1d23b8d75ef638f92cb98b6
> Author: Dave Chinner<dchinner at redhat.com>
> Date: Mon Jan 21 23:53:52 2013 +1100
>
> xfs: fix _xfs_buf_find oops on blocks beyond the filesystem end
>
> When _xfs_buf_find is passed an out of range address, it will fail
> to find a relevant struct xfs_perag and oops with a null
> dereference. This can happen when trying to walk a filesystem with a
> metadata inode that has a partially corrupted extent map (i.e. the
> block number returned is corrupt, but is otherwise intact) and we
> try to read from the corrupted block address.
>
> In this case, just fail the lookup. If it is readahead being issued,
> it will simply not be done, but if it is real read that fails we
> will get an error being reported. Ideally this case should result
> in an EFSCORRUPTED error being reported, but we cannot return an
> error through xfs_buf_read() or xfs_buf_get() so this lookup failure
> may result in ENOMEM or EIO errors being reported instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner<dchinner at redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Brian Foster<bfoster at redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ben Myers<bpm at sgi.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Myers<bpm at sgi.com>
>
>> The recovery value is bad and is a problem on its own, but XFS does
>> not verify the validity of ag number when doing a xfs_perag_get().
>
> Right, that's what the above fix does, but it can't be done on older
> kernels because grwofs relies on being able to get buffers beyond
> the existing filesystem limits...
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dave.
Thank-you, that make sense.
I still do not like assuming xfs_perag_get() will always return a valid
perag pointer.
--Mark.
More information about the xfs
mailing list