xfs_iunlink_remove: xfs_inotobp() returned error 22 -- debugging
Dave Chinner
david at fromorbit.com
Mon Apr 22 19:08:35 CDT 2013
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 02:59:54PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 4/15/13 6:14 PM, Brian Foster wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thanks for the data in the previous thread:
> >
> > http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2013-04/msg00327.html
> >
> > I'm spinning off a new thread specifically for this because the original
> > thread is already too large and scattered to track. As Eric stated,
> > please try to keep data contained in as few messages as possible.
> >
>
> Well, it's always simple in the end. It just took a lot of debugging
> to figure out what was happening - we do appreciate your help with that!
>
> We were able to create a local reproducer, and it looks like
> this patch fixes things:
>
> commit aae8a97d3ec30788790d1720b71d76fd8eb44b73
> Author: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Date: Sat Jan 29 18:43:27 2011 +0530
>
> fs: Don't allow to create hardlink for deleted file
Good find Eric - great work on the reproducer script.
FWIW, can you confirm that a debug kernel assert fails
with a non-zero link count in xfs_bumplink() with your test case?
int
xfs_bumplink(
xfs_trans_t *tp,
xfs_inode_t *ip)
{
xfs_trans_ichgtime(tp, ip, XFS_ICHGTIME_CHG);
>>>>> ASSERT(ip->i_d.di_nlink > 0);
ip->i_d.di_nlink++;
inc_nlink(VFS_I(ip));
If it does, we should consider this a in-memory corruption case and
return and trigger a shutdown here....
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david at fromorbit.com
More information about the xfs
mailing list