xfs_iunlink_remove: xfs_inotobp() returned error 22 -- debugging
符永涛
yongtaofu at gmail.com
Fri Apr 19 20:15:19 CDT 2013
Dear xfs experts,
Does mount with sync option helps to isolate this problem?
2013/4/20 符永涛 <yongtaofu at gmail.com>
> Dear Eric and xfs experts,
> Updated progress is after more than one day glusterfs rebalance 3 of our
> servers xfs shutdown(8 servers in the test cluster). The errors are
> identical. Actually one of the most serious accident for us is 8 of our
> servers xfs shutdown at the same time during glusterfs rebalance.
> Thank you very much!
>
>
> 2013/4/20 符永涛 <yongtaofu at gmail.com>
>
>> Dear Eric,
>> I noticed some functions call the xfs_lock_two_inodes(dp, ip,
>> XFS_ILOCK_EXCL); twince but not in xfs_remove.
>>
>>
>> 2013/4/20 符永涛 <yongtaofu at gmail.com>
>>
>>> There it is, I use latest 279.19.1 and only apply xfs trace path.
>>>
>>>
>>> 2013/4/20 Eric Sandeen <sandeen at sandeen.net>
>>>
>>>> On 4/19/13 10:00 AM, 符永涛 wrote:
>>>> > Dear Eric,
>>>> >
>>>> > I checked rh srpm
>>>> https://content-web.rhn.redhat.com/rhn/public/NULL/kernel/2.6.32-279.19.1.el6/SRPMS/kernel-2.6.32-279.19.1.el6.src.rpm?__gda__=1366390847_8550b8568c50ea46b3180266b476353d&ext=.rpm
>>>> > And the code is same, as following:
>>>> >
>>>> > __rwsem_do_wake(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int wakewrite)
>>>> > {
>>>>
>>>> need to look in lib/rwsem.c not lib/rwsem-spinlock.c
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> -Eric
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> 符永涛
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> 符永涛
>>
>
>
>
> --
> 符永涛
>
--
符永涛
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://oss.sgi.com/pipermail/xfs/attachments/20130420/ccc0961e/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the xfs
mailing list