xfs_iunlink_remove: xfs_inotobp() returned error 22 -- debugging
符永涛
yongtaofu at gmail.com
Fri Apr 19 12:17:20 CDT 2013
Dear Eric,
I noticed some functions call the xfs_lock_two_inodes(dp, ip,
XFS_ILOCK_EXCL); twince but not in xfs_remove.
2013/4/20 符永涛 <yongtaofu at gmail.com>
> There it is, I use latest 279.19.1 and only apply xfs trace path.
>
>
> 2013/4/20 Eric Sandeen <sandeen at sandeen.net>
>
>> On 4/19/13 10:00 AM, 符永涛 wrote:
>> > Dear Eric,
>> >
>> > I checked rh srpm
>> https://content-web.rhn.redhat.com/rhn/public/NULL/kernel/2.6.32-279.19.1.el6/SRPMS/kernel-2.6.32-279.19.1.el6.src.rpm?__gda__=1366390847_8550b8568c50ea46b3180266b476353d&ext=.rpm
>> > And the code is same, as following:
>> >
>> > __rwsem_do_wake(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int wakewrite)
>> > {
>>
>> need to look in lib/rwsem.c not lib/rwsem-spinlock.c
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -Eric
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> 符永涛
>
--
符永涛
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://oss.sgi.com/pipermail/xfs/attachments/20130420/82c4b229/attachment.html>
More information about the xfs
mailing list