[PATCH 3/3] xfstests generic 310: fix common file path and other cleanups
Eryu Guan
eguan at redhat.com
Tue Apr 9 00:29:13 CDT 2013
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 09:05:07AM -0500, Rich Johnston wrote:
> Hi Eryu,
>
> Thanks for this cleanup patch. I was going to revert patch
> "bbaf78c0" which introduced test generic/310 but will wait and see
> if Zhao will provide more information which could be added to this
> patch.
Make sense, thanks for the review.
>
>
> On 04/07/2013 05:39 AM, Eryu Guan wrote:
> >1. add one space between # and test description
>
> The rest of the changes look good, sorry I missed them when I reviewed ;).
>
> >2. remove creator/owner info
> >3. fix common/rc and common/filter path so they can be sourced correctly
> >4. no need to remove $seq.full cause it's not used(or if verbose output
> > is needed, $seqres.full should be used)
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <eguan at redhat.com>
> >---
> > tests/generic/310 | 12 +++++-------
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/tests/generic/310 b/tests/generic/310
> >index ef51422..35baa23 100644
> >--- a/tests/generic/310
> >+++ b/tests/generic/310
> >@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
> > #! /bin/bash
> > # FS QA Test No. 310
> > #
> >-#Check if there are two threads,one keeps calling read() or lseek(), and
> >-#the other calling readdir(), both on the same directory fd.
> >+# Check if there are two threads,one keeps calling read() or lseek(), and
> >+# the other calling readdir(), both on the same directory fd.
> > #
>
> Hi Zhao,
>
> I did see both threads running at the same time, but the more I look
> at this, the more I am a loss as to what this test is doing.
>
> Will you expand this a little please. I should have asked for more
> justification the first time I reviewed this. Please provide what
> bug
> this is testing or what failure/weakness this test exposes. If
> there is a commit this is related to, please reference it.
I didn't look into the test deeply but I found the test seems to run for
hours on my 3.9-rc4 test box, not sure what goes wrong here.
Thanks,
Eryu
>
> Thanks
> --Rich
More information about the xfs
mailing list