[PATCH 3/3] xfstests generic 310: fix common file path and other cleanups
Rich Johnston
rjohnston at sgi.com
Mon Apr 8 09:05:07 CDT 2013
Hi Eryu,
Thanks for this cleanup patch. I was going to revert patch "bbaf78c0"
which introduced test generic/310 but will wait and see if Zhao will
provide more information which could be added to this patch.
On 04/07/2013 05:39 AM, Eryu Guan wrote:
> 1. add one space between # and test description
The rest of the changes look good, sorry I missed them when I reviewed ;).
> 2. remove creator/owner info
> 3. fix common/rc and common/filter path so they can be sourced correctly
> 4. no need to remove $seq.full cause it's not used(or if verbose output
> is needed, $seqres.full should be used)
>
> Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <eguan at redhat.com>
> ---
> tests/generic/310 | 12 +++++-------
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/generic/310 b/tests/generic/310
> index ef51422..35baa23 100644
> --- a/tests/generic/310
> +++ b/tests/generic/310
> @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
> #! /bin/bash
> # FS QA Test No. 310
> #
> -#Check if there are two threads,one keeps calling read() or lseek(), and
> -#the other calling readdir(), both on the same directory fd.
> +# Check if there are two threads,one keeps calling read() or lseek(), and
> +# the other calling readdir(), both on the same directory fd.
> #
Hi Zhao,
I did see both threads running at the same time, but the more I look at
this, the more I am a loss as to what this test is doing.
Will you expand this a little please. I should have asked for more
justification the first time I reviewed this. Please provide what bug
this is testing or what failure/weakness this test exposes. If there is
a commit this is related to, please reference it.
Thanks
--Rich
More information about the xfs
mailing list