[PATCH 2/4] xfs: add xfs_set_inode32()
Brian Foster
bfoster at redhat.com
Mon Sep 17 21:12:59 CDT 2012
On 09/17/2012 12:51 PM, Carlos Maiolino wrote:
> xfs_set_inode32() can be used to enable inode32 allocation mode. this will
> reduce the amount of duplicated code needed to mount/remount a filesystem with
> inode32 option.
> This patch also enable xfs_set_inode64() to return a xfs_agnumber_t value to
> also be used during mount/remount, instead of duplicate code
>
> Signed-off-by: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino at redhat.com>
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_super.c | 102 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> fs/xfs/xfs_super.h | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
> index b1aa2db..2d7a0d9 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
> @@ -598,6 +598,84 @@ xfs_max_file_offset(
> return (((__uint64_t)pagefactor) << bitshift) - 1;
> }
>
> +xfs_agnumber_t
> +xfs_set_inode64(struct xfs_mount *mp)
> +{
> + xfs_agnumber_t index = 0;
> +
> + for (index = 0; index < mp->m_sb.sb_agcount; index++) {
> + struct xfs_perag *pag;
> +
> + pag = xfs_perag_get(mp, index);
> + pag->pagi_inodeok = 1;
> + pag->pagf_metadata = 0;
> + xfs_perag_put(pag);
> + }
> +
> + /* There is no need for lock protection on m_flags,
> + * the rw_semaphore of the VFS superblock is locked
> + * during mount/umount/remount operations, so this is
> + * enough to avoid concurency on the m_flags field
> + */
> + mp->m_flags &= ~(XFS_MOUNT_32BITINODES |
> + XFS_MOUNT_SMALL_INUMS);
> + mp->m_maxagi = index;
> +
> + return index;
> +}
> +
> +xfs_agnumber_t
> +xfs_set_inode32(struct xfs_mount *mp)
> +{
> + xfs_agnumber_t index;
> + xfs_agnumber_t i = 0;
> + xfs_sb_t *sbp = &mp->m_sb;
> + xfs_agnumber_t max_metadata;
> + xfs_agino_t agino = XFS_OFFBNO_TO_AGINO(mp, sbp->sb_agblocks -1, 0);
> + xfs_ino_t ino = XFS_AGINO_TO_INO(mp, sbp->sb_agcount -1, agino);
> + xfs_perag_t *pag;
> +
> + /* Calculate how much should be reserved for inodes to meet
> + * the max inode percentage.
> + */
> + if (mp->m_maxicount) {
> + __uint64_t icount;
> +
> + icount = sbp->sb_dblocks * sbp->sb_imax_pct;
> + do_div(icount, 100);
> + icount += sbp->sb_agblocks - 1;
> + do_div(icount, sbp->sb_agblocks);
> + max_metadata = icount;
> + } else {
> + max_metadata = sbp->sb_agcount;
> + }
> +
> + for (index = 0; index < sbp->sb_agcount; index++) {
> + ino = XFS_AGINO_TO_INO(mp, index, agino);
> +
> + if (ino > XFS_MAXINUMBER_32) {
> + i++;
> + pag = xfs_perag_get(mp, index);
> + pag->pagi_inodeok = 0;
> + pag->pagf_metadata = 1;
Is it correct to set pagf_metadata here? I'm learning some of this code
as I review this so I could be wrong, but it looks like pagf_metadata
basically sets a preference on an ag for metadata (e.g., presumably
because we are limiting metadata space on a potentially large fs). The
existing code looks like it sets pagf_metadata only on AG's below the
max_metadata mark...
Brian
> + xfs_perag_put(pag);
> + continue;
> + }
> +
> + pag = xfs_perag_get(mp, index);
> + pag->pagi_inodeok = 1;
> + if (index < max_metadata)
> + pag->pagf_metadata = 1;
> +
> + xfs_perag_put(pag);
> + }
> +
> + index -= i;
> + mp->m_flags |= (XFS_MOUNT_32BITINODES |
> + XFS_MOUNT_SMALL_INUMS);
> + return index;
> +}
> +
> STATIC int
> xfs_blkdev_get(
> xfs_mount_t *mp,
> @@ -1037,30 +1115,6 @@ xfs_restore_resvblks(struct xfs_mount *mp)
> xfs_reserve_blocks(mp, &resblks, NULL);
> }
>
> -STATIC void
> -xfs_set_inode64(struct xfs_mount *mp)
> -{
> - int i = 0;
> -
> - for (i = 0; i < mp->m_sb.sb_agcount; i++) {
> - struct xfs_perag *pag;
> -
> - pag = xfs_perag_get(mp, i);
> - pag->pagi_inodeok = 1;
> - pag->pagf_metadata = 0;
> - xfs_perag_put(pag);
> - }
> -
> - /* There is no need for lock protection on m_flags,
> - * the rw_semaphore of the VFS superblock is locked
> - * during mount/umount/remount operations, so this is
> - * enough to avoid concurency on the m_flags field
> - */
> - mp->m_flags &= ~(XFS_MOUNT_32BITINODES |
> - XFS_MOUNT_SMALL_INUMS);
> - mp->m_maxagi = i;
> -}
> -
> STATIC int
> xfs_fs_remount(
> struct super_block *sb,
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.h
> index 09b0c26..9de4a92 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.h
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.h
> @@ -75,6 +75,8 @@ struct block_device;
> extern __uint64_t xfs_max_file_offset(unsigned int);
>
> extern void xfs_blkdev_issue_flush(struct xfs_buftarg *);
> +extern xfs_agnumber_t xfs_set_inode32(struct xfs_mount *);
> +extern xfs_agnumber_t xfs_set_inode64(struct xfs_mount *);
>
> extern const struct export_operations xfs_export_operations;
> extern const struct xattr_handler *xfs_xattr_handlers[];
>
More information about the xfs
mailing list