[RFC, PATCH 0/102]: xfs: 3.0.x stable kernel update
Christoph Hellwig
hch at infradead.org
Sat Sep 1 18:10:19 CDT 2012
I've done a brief look over the patches this week and while I can't spot
anything wrong I'm defintively a bit concerned about the amount of churn
for a long term stable series. A lot of this does not seem to fit the
strict -stable criteria, and given that I've not really seen any major
issues with the current 3.0-stable codebase I'm wondering what the
guranteed gain vs the status quo is.
More information about the xfs
mailing list