[PATCH] xfstests: test EROFS vs. EEXIST when creating on an RO filesystem
Eric Sandeen
sandeen at redhat.com
Tue Nov 27 16:12:58 CST 2012
On 11/27/12 4:11 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 03:16:39PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> TBH, I don't know if this is posix-specified, but I found out the
>> hard way that when trying to re-create existing files on a readonly
>> filesystem, some apps expect/handle EEXIST, but fail on EROFS.
>>
>> This will test mkdir, mknod, and symlinks for that behavior.
>
> Just curious, which filesystem would fail this currently or did in the
> past?
No single filesystem, really -
I temporarily broke the VFS in a rhel backport. ;) But it seems like
the kind of thing that could be missed in the future, so figured it was
worth a quick test.
(basically this was from moving mnt_want_write outside i_mutex for freeze
work, and returning an error directly from mnt_want_write() would
give us EROFS instead of maybe EEXIST)
-Eric
More information about the xfs
mailing list