[PATCH v2] xfstests: get return value in seek_sanity_test

[Mark Tinguely]

On 11/08/12 21:25, Zheng Liu wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 09:15:09PM +0800, wenqing.lz wrote:
>
> ping?
>
> Regards,
> Zheng
>
>> From: Zheng Liu<wenqing.lz at taobao.com>
>>
>> In seek_sanity_test getting return value is missing.  Thus we couldn't get the
>> result unless someone read the log file (e.g. # 285).
>>
>> CC: Jeff Liu<jeff.liu at oracle.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Zheng Liu<wenqing.lz at taobao.com>
>> ---
>> v2<- v1:
>> 	* put return value check below the run_test()
>>
>> Hi Jeff,
>>
>> Could you please review this patch again?  Thanks.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Zheng
>>
>>   src/seek_sanity_test.c | 4 ++--
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/src/seek_sanity_test.c b/src/seek_sanity_test.c
>> index 34f5508..3897f02 100644
>> --- a/src/seek_sanity_test.c
>> +++ b/src/seek_sanity_test.c
>> @@ -674,9 +674,9 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
>>   		goto out;
>>
>>   	for (i = 0; i<  numtests; ++i) {
>> +		ret = run_test(&seek_tests[i]);
>>   		if (ret)
>> -			goto out;
>> -		run_test(&seek_tests[i]);
>> +			break;
>>   	}
>>
>>   out:
>> --
>> 1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs at oss.sgi.com
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

Hi Jeff and Zheng,

Jeff, can I assume by your email:

   http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2012-10/msg00412.html

that you are giving your Reviewed-by:?

It also looks good to me too:

Reviewed-by: Mark Tinguely <tinguely at sgi.com>

I will make sure it gets committed.

--Mark.