How to reserve disk space in XFS to make the blocks over many files continuous?
huubby zhou
huubby1 at gmail.com
Fri Nov 9 00:50:02 CST 2012
By "According to your advice...", I mean what your demonstrated.
I mount with inode64, and everything is working perfectly.
Many thanks, really appreciate!
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Dave Chinner <david at fromorbit.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 10:04:57AM +0800, huubby zhou wrote:
> > Hi, Dave,
> >
> > Thanks for the answer, it's great, and I apologize for the terrible
> format.
> >
> > >You can't, directly. If you have enough contiguous free space in the
> > >AG that you are allocating in, then you will get contiguous files if
> > >the allocation size lines up with the filesystem geometry:
> > >
> > >$ for i in `seq 1 10` ; do sudo xfs_io -f -c "truncate 512m" -c "resvsp
> 0
> > 512m" foo.$i ; done
> > >$ sudo xfs_bmap -vp foo.[1-9] foo.10 |grep " 0:"
> > > EXT: FILE-OFFSET BLOCK-RANGE AG AG-OFFSET TOTAL FLAGS
> > > sudo xfs_bmap -vp foo.[1-9] foo.10 |grep " 0:"
> > > 0: [0..1048575]: 8096..1056671 0 (8096..1056671) 1048576
> 10000
> > > 0: [0..1048575]: 1056672..2105247 0 (1056672..2105247) 1048576
> 10000
> > > 0: [0..1048575]: 2105248..3153823 0 (2105248..3153823) 1048576
> 10000
> > > 0: [0..1048575]: 3153824..4202399 0 (3153824..4202399) 1048576
> 10000
> > > 0: [0..1048575]: 4202400..5250975 0 (4202400..5250975) 1048576
> 10000
> > > 0: [0..1048575]: 5250976..6299551 0 (5250976..6299551) 1048576
> 10000
> > > 0: [0..1048575]: 6299552..7348127 0 (6299552..7348127) 1048576
> 10000
> > > 0: [0..1048575]: 7348128..8396703 0 (7348128..8396703) 1048576
> 10000
> > > 0: [0..1048575]: 8396704..9445279 0 (8396704..9445279) 1048576
> 10000
> > > 0: [0..1048575]: 9445280..10493855 0 (9445280..10493855) 1048576
> > 10000
> > >
> > >So all those files are contiguous both internally and externally. If
> > >there isn't sufficient contiguous freespace, or there is allocator
> > >contention, this won't happen - it's best effort behaviour....
> >
> > I believe you got these in a single AG, but I do the allocation in
> > filesystem
> > with multi-AGs, specifically, it is a 6T storage space, and I run the
> > mkfs.xfs
> > without setting the AG number/size, it ends up with 32 AGs.
> > My files layout:
> > - 0 - dir
> > | - 0 - dir
> > | | - 1 - file
> > | | - 2 - file
> > | | - 3 - file
> > | | - 4 - file
> > | | - 5 - file
> > | | - ... - file
> > | | - 128 - file
> > | - 1 - dir
> > | | - 1 - file
> > | | - 2 - file
> > | | - 3 - file
> > | | - 4 - file
> > | | - 5 - file
> > | | - ... - file
> > | | - 128 - file
> > | - ... - dir
> > Every file is 512MB, every directory holds 512MB*128=64GB.
>
> Yup, that's exactly by design. That's how the inode64 allocation
> policy is supposed to work.
>
> > According to your advice and XFS document, I tried to set the AG size to
> > 64GB,
>
> What advice might that be? I don't thikn I've ever recommended
> anyone use 96*64GB AGs. Unless you have 96 allocations all occurring
> at the same time (very rare, in my experience), there is no need for
> some many AGs.
>
>
> > for avoiding the allocator contention and keeping all files in single
> > directory
> > fall in the same AG, but it didn't work. The files are still in different
> > AGs.
> > My xfs_info:
> > meta-data=/dev/sdc2 isize=256 agcount=96, agsize=16777216
> > blks
> > = sectsz=512 attr=0
> > data = bsize=4096 blocks=1610116329,
> imaxpct=25
> > = sunit=0 swidth=0 blks, unwritten=1
> > naming =version 2 bsize=4096
> > log =internal log bsize=4096 blocks=32768, version=1
> > = sectsz=512 sunit=0 blks, lazy-count=0
> > realtime =none extsz=4096 blocks=0, rtextents=0
> >
> > The files:
> > $ for i in `seq 1 10` ; do sudo xfs_io -f -c "truncate 512m" -c "resvsp 0
> > 512m" foo.$i ; done
> > $ sudo xfs_bmap -vp *| grep " 0:"
> > 0: [0..1048575]: 2147483712..2148532287 16 (64..1048639) 1048576
> > 10000
> > 0: [0..1048575]: 3355443264..3356491839 25 (64..1048639) 1048576
> > 10000
> > 0: [0..1048575]: 2281701440..2282750015 17 (64..1048639) 1048576
> > 10000
> > 0: [0..1048575]: 2415919168..2416967743 18 (64..1048639) 1048576
> > 10000
> > 0: [0..1048575]: 2550136896..2551185471 19 (64..1048639) 1048576
> > 10000
> > 0: [0..1048575]: 2684354624..2685403199 20 (64..1048639) 1048576
> > 10000
> > 0: [0..1048575]: 2818572352..2819620927 21 (64..1048639) 1048576
> > 10000
> > 0: [0..1048575]: 2952790080..2953838655 22 (64..1048639) 1048576
> > 10000
> > 0: [0..1048575]: 3087007808..3088056383 23 (64..1048639) 1048576
> > 10000
> > 0: [0..1048575]: 3221225536..3222274111 24 (64..1048639) 1048576
> > 10000
>
> That's inode32 allocator behaviour (rotoring each new allocation
> across a different AG). Mount with inode64 - it's the default in the
> latest kernels - and it will behave as I demonstrated.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dave.
>
> --
> Dave Chinner
> david at fromorbit.com
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://oss.sgi.com/pipermail/xfs/attachments/20121109/57214e9d/attachment.htm>
More information about the xfs
mailing list