better perf and memory uage for xfs_fsr? Trivial patch against xfstools-3.16 included...

[Dave Chinner]

On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 12:30:11PM -0800, Linda Walsh wrote:
> FWIW, the benefit, probably comes from the read-file, as the written file
> is written with DIRECT I/O and I can't see that it should make a difference
> there.

Hmmm, so it does. I think that's probably the bug that needs to be
fixed, not so much using posix_fadvise....

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david at fromorbit.com