[PATCH 2/2] xfs_logprint: Handle continued inode transactions

Eric Sandeen sandeen at redhat.com
Thu Nov 1 11:32:48 CDT 2012


xlog_print_trans_inode() has a special case for 2
specific op_head->oh_len lengths.  If it matches
sizeof(xfs_inode_log_format_32_t) or
sizeof(xfs_inode_log_format_64_t), it assumes that
it's got an inode, and attempts to convert it and
print it accordingly.

However, if we arrive here via an op header which
is continued, then the length is simply a continuation
of the previous op, and it might *randomly* match the
size of one of the inode log formats, and thus get parsed
incorrectly.

Change the caller to pass in whether or not it's a continued
op, so that it can be handled correctly.

Tested by running xfs_logprint of TEST_DEV in xfsprogs
after sequential tests; without this change it gets off
in the weeds eventually; with this fix, it lasts longer,
until it hits some other yet-unfixed logprint bug...

Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen at redhat.com>
---


diff --git a/logprint/log_misc.c b/logprint/log_misc.c
index be2426e..75e221d 100644
--- a/logprint/log_misc.c
+++ b/logprint/log_misc.c
@@ -595,7 +595,7 @@ xlog_print_dir_sf(xfs_dir_shortform_t *sfp, int size)
 }
 
 int
-xlog_print_trans_inode(xfs_caddr_t *ptr, int len, int *i, int num_ops)
+xlog_print_trans_inode(xfs_caddr_t *ptr, int len, int *i, int num_ops, int continued)
 {
     xfs_icdinode_t	   dino;
     xlog_op_header_t	   *op_head;
@@ -617,8 +617,9 @@ xlog_print_trans_inode(xfs_caddr_t *ptr, int len, int *i, int num_ops)
     memmove(&src_lbuf, *ptr, MIN(sizeof(xfs_inode_log_format_64_t), len));
     (*i)++;					/* bump index */
     *ptr += len;
-    if (len == sizeof(xfs_inode_log_format_32_t) ||
-	len == sizeof(xfs_inode_log_format_64_t)) {
+    if (!continued &&
+	(len == sizeof(xfs_inode_log_format_32_t) ||
+	 len == sizeof(xfs_inode_log_format_64_t))) {
 	f = xfs_inode_item_format_convert((char*)&src_lbuf, len, &dst_lbuf);
 	printf(_("INODE: "));
 	printf(_("#regs: %d   ino: 0x%llx  flags: 0x%x   dsize: %d\n"),
@@ -932,16 +933,18 @@ xlog_print_record(int			  fd,
 
     ptr = buf;
     for (i=0; i<num_ops; i++) {
+	int continued;
+
 	xlog_op_header_t *op_head = (xlog_op_header_t *)ptr;
 
 	print_xlog_op_line();
 	xlog_print_op_header(op_head, i, &ptr);
+	continued = (XLOG_SET(op_head->oh_flags, XLOG_WAS_CONT_TRANS) ||
+		     XLOG_SET(op_head->oh_flags, XLOG_CONTINUE_TRANS));
 
 	/* print transaction data */
 	if (print_no_data ||
-	    ((XLOG_SET(op_head->oh_flags, XLOG_WAS_CONT_TRANS) ||
-	      XLOG_SET(op_head->oh_flags, XLOG_CONTINUE_TRANS)) &&
-	     be32_to_cpu(op_head->oh_len) == 0)) {
+	    (continued && be32_to_cpu(op_head->oh_len) == 0)) {
 	    for (n = 0; n < be32_to_cpu(op_head->oh_len); n++) {
 		printf("%c", *ptr);
 		ptr++;
@@ -970,7 +973,7 @@ xlog_print_record(int			  fd,
 		    case XFS_LI_INODE: {
 			skip = xlog_print_trans_inode(&ptr,
 					be32_to_cpu(op_head->oh_len),
-					&i, num_ops);
+					&i, num_ops, continued);
 			break;
 		    }
 		    case XFS_LI_DQUOT: {




More information about the xfs mailing list