[PATCH 3/5] xfs: reduce ilock hold times in xfs_setattr_size
Dave Chinner
david at fromorbit.com
Mon Mar 26 17:17:51 CDT 2012
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 05:14:24PM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> We do not need the ilock for most checks done in the beginning of
> xfs_setattr_size. Replace the long critical section before starting the
> transaction with a smaller one around xfs_zero_eof and an optional one
> inside xfs_qm_dqattach that isn't entered unless using quotas. While
> this isn't a big optimization for xfs_setattr_size itself it will allow
> pushing the ilock into xfs_zero_eof itself later.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de>
Looks sane to me.
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner at redhat.com>
--
Dave Chinner
david at fromorbit.com
More information about the xfs
mailing list