[PATCH 2/9] xfs: convert internal buffer functions to pass maps

[Ben Myers]

Hey Fellas,

On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 04:29:31PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 02:04:00AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 03:56:19PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > > they are rebased not to require the inode allocator patchset.  I think that Jan
> > > > is also going to repost his 'Fix overallocation in xfs_buf_allocate_memory()'
> > > > based upon Dave's suggestions.  It's best not to depend upon that either.  What
> > > > do you say, Dave?
> > > 
> > > I reorder my local patch set and repost it after running it through
> > > some testing....
> > 
> > Sorry, I totally misunderstood the initial issue - I though Ben had my
> > series applied, and thus yours didn't apply.
> 
> No, other way around ;)

Right.  Dave's buffer changes don't apply without Christoph's inode allocator
patchset and Jan's overallocation fix.

> But I'm going to leave Jan kara's buffer cache over-allocation bug
> fix ahead my list, because that has to go into 3.5-rcX as it is a
> regression fix....

Last I saw Jan is going to respin his overallocation fix.

> FWIW, Ben, there's a few reviewed bug fixes on the list that are
> outstanding that need to go to Linus ASAP:
> 
> http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2012-06/msg00154.html
> http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2012-06/msg00134.html

I am testing these... 

> http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2012-06/msg00056.html (regression)

...waiting for a respin from Jan.

> Can you take care of them please?

Yep, just doing some basic testing first.  There are a few others that I also
will be looking to pull in.

> > I still think reordering is better - I'm quite busy and I'd rather get
> > your series reviewed first before redoing and retesting the inode
> > allocator changes.
> > 
> > In fact I'll start reviewing them in about 10 minutes after I've
> > finished catching up on email for this morning.
> 
> Cool. I'm just rebasing right now....

That'll be great... I too will make reviewing (and testing) these a high
priority.  Just keep in mind we don't control Jan's schedule...

-Ben