followup on benchmarks of an xfs embedded system (without rt section)

[Stewart Smith]

Dave Chinner <david at fromorbit.com> writes:

> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 03:35:40AM -0700, Jason Newton wrote:
>> I've attached my benchmark program but I use alot of boost c++ with a
>> little internal set of libraries... so you can see what I"m doing but it
>> likely won't compile for you.  I'll also mention that boost is a very low
>> overhead (if any) over all the normal system calls one would use (verified
>> by reading sourcecode in use).
>
> I'd suggest rewriting it so we can compile and run it. If I can
> reproduce the problem, I can at least understand where the latency
> is coming from.

The boost::chrono usage is the weirdest one that'll likely cause
issues. Should be replaced with boost::posix_time instead (it's been
around a lot longer)... otherwise it's just having to install all the
boost headers I think (boost is basically 99.9% implemented in header
files and templates)

-- 
Stewart Smith
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://oss.sgi.com/pipermail/xfs/attachments/20120731/da0ae373/attachment.sig>