[PATCH 2/2] xfs: rename xfs_fs_* to xfs_*

[Wanlong Gao]

On 07/02/2012 07:47 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 02:06:42AM +0800, Wanlong Gao wrote:
>> s/xfs_fs_/xfs_/
>> This too long name is unnecessary.
> 
> NACK. Not the right way to approach the problem.
> 
> Yes, there are a couple of places where this could be done, but most
> of the transformations, IMO, are wrong and remove critical
> information from the namespace.
> 
> Firstly, we want to get rid of the xfs_fs_subr.c wrappers and
> replace them with the native linux functions, not move them around.
> 
> Secondly, transformations like xfs_fs_geometry to xfs_geometry are
> incorrect - the function is returning the filesystem geometry, so
> the name "fs_geometry" is actually correct. Similar for
> xfs_fs_writeable, xfs_fs_show_options and so on.

Thank you for teaching this.

Wanlong Gao

> 
> Finally:
> 
>>  const struct export_operations xfs_export_operations = {
>> -	.encode_fh		= xfs_fs_encode_fh,
>> -	.fh_to_dentry		= xfs_fs_fh_to_dentry,
>> -	.fh_to_parent		= xfs_fs_fh_to_parent,
>> -	.get_parent		= xfs_fs_get_parent,
>> -	.commit_metadata	= xfs_fs_nfs_commit_metadata,
>> +	.encode_fh		= xfs_encode_fh,
>> +	.fh_to_dentry		= xfs_fh_to_dentry,
>> +	.fh_to_parent		= xfs_fh_to_parent,
>> +	.get_parent		= xfs_get_parent,
>> +	.commit_metadata	= xfs_nfs_commit_metadata,
> 
> ....
> 
>>  static const struct super_operations xfs_super_operations = {
>> -	.alloc_inode		= xfs_fs_alloc_inode,
>> -	.destroy_inode		= xfs_fs_destroy_inode,
>> -	.dirty_inode		= xfs_fs_dirty_inode,
>> -	.evict_inode		= xfs_fs_evict_inode,
>> -	.drop_inode		= xfs_fs_drop_inode,
>> -	.put_super		= xfs_fs_put_super,
>> -	.sync_fs		= xfs_fs_sync_fs,
>> -	.freeze_fs		= xfs_fs_freeze,
>> -	.unfreeze_fs		= xfs_fs_unfreeze,
>> -	.statfs			= xfs_fs_statfs,
>> -	.remount_fs		= xfs_fs_remount,
>> -	.show_options		= xfs_fs_show_options,
>> -	.nr_cached_objects	= xfs_fs_nr_cached_objects,
>> -	.free_cached_objects	= xfs_fs_free_cached_objects,
>> +	.alloc_inode		= xfs_alloc_inode,
>> +	.destroy_inode		= xfs_destroy_inode,
>> +	.dirty_inode		= xfs_dirty_inode,
>> +	.evict_inode		= xfs_evict_inode,
>> +	.drop_inode		= xfs_drop_inode,
>> +	.put_super		= xfs_put_super,
>> +	.sync_fs		= xfs_sync_fs,
>> +	.freeze_fs		= xfs_freeze,
>> +	.unfreeze_fs		= xfs_unfreeze,
>> +	.statfs			= xfs_statfs,
>> +	.remount_fs		= xfs_remount,
>> +	.show_options		= xfs_show_options,
>> +	.nr_cached_objects	= xfs_nr_cached_objects,
>> +	.free_cached_objects	= xfs_free_cached_objects,
>>  };
> 
> These should indicate that there is a valid, consistent namespacing
> here to indicate layering of the the code. i.e. that xfs_fs_*
> functions are typically VFS method functions of some kind. 
> 
>> -static struct file_system_type xfs_fs_type = {
>> +static struct file_system_type xfs_type = {
> 
> And that is a clear demonstration of my second point....
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Dave.
>