No subject
Tue Jan 31 03:57:03 CST 2012
'sunit' is used with 'swidth'?
The RAID controller in one of my machines uses a "strip element" size,
expressed in bytes, allowed values seem to be limited to powers
of 512*2^*[1..11] (512B up to 1MB) (though as previously noticed, although
xfs's manpages claims to allow one expresses sizes with the unit 'm', it
only permits .25m (256k), I guess I never tried seeing if the command line
would take floating point ;^) ).
I believe 'su' would be set to the 'strip element size' (in k or m).
Then, for RAID 1 (mirror) would 'sw'==1? Would setting the su/sw value
for a RAID 1 actually matter in any way? Ie, technically -- it would
fill in numbers for OS book-keeping, but wouldn't change anything in
terms of performance or layout, vs. 'physically' -- where it could change
disk layout or performance?
At RAID 0, I'd guess sw==2?
In RAID 5, would it be sw == #Disks-1? So even w/6 disks, it still only
uses 1 disk for parity and sw == 5?
I wonder what becomes a max-safe RAID 5 size? (or is the number of parity
disks a settable option with RAID 5?)
Thanks!...
Linda
More information about the xfs
mailing list