[PATCH 3/3] xfs: cleanup quota check on disk blocks and inodes reservations
HAYASAKA Mitsuo
mitsuo.hayasaka.hu at hitachi.com
Thu Feb 2 22:05:57 CST 2012
Hi Christoph
Thank you for your comments.
(2012/02/03 1:07), Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 12:45:43PM +0900, Mitsuo Hayasaka wrote:
>> This patch is a cleanup of quota check on disk blocks and inodes
>> reservations.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mitsuo Hayasaka <mitsuo.hayasaka.hu at hitachi.com>
>> Cc: Ben Myers <bpm at sgi.com>
>> Cc: Alex Elder <elder at kernel.org>
>> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de>
>> ---
>>
>> fs/xfs/xfs_trans_dquot.c | 17 +++++++----------
>> 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_dquot.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_dquot.c
>> index c4ba366..5e6cd1c 100644
>> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_dquot.c
>> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_dquot.c
>> @@ -605,7 +605,7 @@ xfs_trans_dqresv(
>> time_t timer;
>> xfs_qwarncnt_t warns;
>> xfs_qwarncnt_t warnlimit;
>> - xfs_qcnt_t count;
>> + xfs_qcnt_t tcount;
>
> Can you call this variable total_count to make it a bit more obvious?
Sure.
>
>> + tcount = *resbcountp + nblks;
>> + if (hardlimit > 0ULL && tcount > hardlimit) {
>
> Given that xfs_qcnt_t is unsigned what about transforming this into the
> more readable:
>
> if (hardlimit && total_count > hardlimit)
>
> and similar for the others?
>
OK, I'm going to change them and send the revised patch series.
Thanks.
More information about the xfs
mailing list