[PATCH v7 2/4] xfs: Introduce a helper routine to probe data or hole offset from page cache
Jie Liu
jeff.liu at oracle.com
Tue Aug 21 00:04:50 CDT 2012
On 08/21/12 07:13, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 09:07:58PM +0800, Jeff Liu wrote:
>> helper routine to lookup data or hole offset from page cache for unwritten extents.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jie Liu <jeff.liu at oracle.com>
> ....
>> + unsigned int i;
>> +
>> + want = min_t(pgoff_t, end - index, (pgoff_t)PAGEVEC_SIZE);
> No need for the cast to (pgoff_t) here. That's what the min_t()
> macro does for you.
Thanks for pointing this out.
>
>> + for (i = 0; i < nr_pages; i++) {
>> + struct page *page = pvec.pages[i];
>> + loff_t b_offset;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Page index is out of range, searching done.
>> + * If the current offset is not reaches the end
>> + * of the specified search range, there should
>> + * be a hole between them.
>> + */
>> + if (page->index > end) {
>> + if (type == HOLE_OFF && lastoff < endoff) {
>> + *offset = lastoff;
>> + found = true;
>> + }
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>> +
>> + lock_page(page);
>> + /*
>> + * Page truncated or invalidated(page->mapping == NULL).
>> + * We can freely skip it and proceed to check the next
>> + * page.
>> + */
>> + if (unlikely(page->mapping != inode->i_mapping)) {
>> + unlock_page(page);
>> + continue;
>> + }
> Still need to check page->index again after locking the page. As
> this isn't performance critical, I don't think you need the check
> before the page is locked, anyway....
I understand that we have to check page->mapping with page locked
because race against inode truncation.
But could you teaching me why page->index will be changed in either
memory reclaim or truncates even if
the page returned with refcount > 0?
Thanks,
-Jeff
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dave.
More information about the xfs
mailing list