XFS: Abysmal write performance because of excessive seeking (allocation groups to blame?)
Joe Landman
joe.landman at gmail.com
Tue Apr 10 09:32:20 CDT 2012
On 04/10/2012 10:02 AM, Stefan Ring wrote:
>> And is XFS aligned to the RAID 6?
>>
>> What does xfs_info display on it?
>
> Yes, it’s aligned.
>
> meta-data=/dev/mapper/vg_data-lvhome isize=256 agcount=4,
> agsize=73233656 blks
> = sectsz=512 attr=2
> data = bsize=4096 blocks=292934624, imaxpct=5
> = sunit=8 swidth=32 blks
> naming =version 2 bsize=4096 ascii-ci=0
> log =internal bsize=4096 blocks=143040, version=2
> = sectsz=512 sunit=8 blks, lazy-count=1
> realtime =none extsz=4096 blocks=0, rtextents=0
>
> I changed the stripe size to 32kb in the meantime. This way, it
> performs slightly better.
try 128k to 512k for stripe size. And try to increase your agcount by
(nearly) an order of magnitude.
--
Joseph Landman, Ph.D
Founder and CEO
Scalable Informatics Inc.
email: landman at scalableinformatics.com
web : http://scalableinformatics.com
http://scalableinformatics.com/sicluster
phone: +1 734 786 8423 x121
fax : +1 866 888 3112
cell : +1 734 612 4615
More information about the xfs
mailing list