XFS: Abysmal write performance because of excessive seeking (allocation groups to blame?)

Emmanuel Florac eflorac at intellique.com
Sat Apr 7 03:53:18 CDT 2012


Le Sat, 7 Apr 2012 09:27:50 +0200 vous écriviez:

> So it sounds like that for poor guys like us, who can’t afford the
> hardware to have dozens of spindles, the best option would be to
> create the XFS file system with agcount=1? That seems to be the only
> reasonable conclusion to me, since a single RAID device, like a single
> disk, cannot write in parallel anyway.

You best option is to buy a SSD. Seriously, even a basic decent consumer
model will bury your array in the dust. Also, recent RAID controllers
from LSI and Adaptec are able to "enhance" a spinning rust array by
using an SSD as a cache.

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Emmanuel Florac     |   Direction technique
                    |   Intellique
                    |	<eflorac at intellique.com>
                    |   +33 1 78 94 84 02
------------------------------------------------------------------------



More information about the xfs mailing list