[PATCH 3/4] xfs: revert to using a kthread for AIL pushing
Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
s.priebe at profihost.ag
Mon Oct 10 01:06:25 CDT 2011
Am 10.10.2011 07:55, schrieb Markus Trippelsdorf:
> Wouldn't it be possible to verify that the problem also goes away with
> this simple one liner?
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
> index 2366c54..daf30c9 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
> @@ -1654,7 +1654,7 @@ xfs_init_workqueues(void)
> if (!xfs_syncd_wq)
> goto out;
>
> - xfs_ail_wq = alloc_workqueue("xfsail", WQ_CPU_INTENSIVE, 8);
> + xfs_ail_wq = alloc_workqueue("xfsail", WQ_HIGHPRI | WQ_CPU_INTENSIVE, 8);
> if (!xfs_ail_wq)
> goto out_destroy_syncd;
>
> From Documentation/workqueue.txt:
>
> WQ_HIGHPRI | WQ_CPU_INTENSIVE
>
> This combination makes the wq avoid interaction with
> concurrency management completely and behave as a simple
> per-CPU execution context provider. Work items queued on a
> highpri CPU-intensive wq start execution as soon as resources
> are available and don't affect execution of other work items.
>
> So this should be identical to reverting back to the kthread. No?
> CCing Tejun, maybe he can comment on this?
We already tested this patch and it still fails / deadlocks:
diff --git a/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_super.c b/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_super.c
index a1a881e..6377f51 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_super.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_super.c
@@ -1669,7 +1669,7 @@ xfs_init_workqueues(void)
if (!xfs_syncd_wq)
goto out;
- xfs_ail_wq = alloc_workqueue("xfsail", WQ_CPU_INTENSIVE, 8);
+ xfs_ail_wq = alloc_workqueue("xfsail", WQ_MEM_RECLAIM | WQ_HIGHPRI, 512);
if (!xfs_ail_wq)
goto out_destroy_syncd;
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_ail.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_ail.c
index 953b142..638ea8b 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_ail.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_ail.c
@@ -600,7 +600,7 @@ out_done:
}
/* There is more to do, requeue us. */
- queue_delayed_work(xfs_syncd_wq, &ailp->xa_work,
+ queue_delayed_work(xfs_ail_wq, &ailp->xa_work,
msecs_to_jiffies(tout));
}
@@ -637,7 +637,7 @@ xfs_ail_push(
smp_wmb();
xfs_trans_ail_copy_lsn(ailp, &ailp->xa_target, &threshold_lsn);
if (!test_and_set_bit(XFS_AIL_PUSHING_BIT, &ailp->xa_flags))
- queue_delayed_work(xfs_syncd_wq, &ailp->xa_work, 0);
+ queue_delayed_work(xfs_ail_wq, &ailp->xa_work, 0);
}
/*
Stefan
More information about the xfs
mailing list