[PATCH] xfs: consolidate & clarify mount sanity checks
Alex Elder
aelder at sgi.com
Tue May 31 17:28:36 CDT 2011
On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 16:52 -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Pavol pointed out that there is one silent error case in the mount
> path, and that others are rather uninformative.
>
> I've taken Pavol's suggested patch and extended it a bit to also:
>
> * fix a message which says "turned off" but actually errors out
> * consolidate the vaguely differentiated "SB sanity check [12]"
> messages, and hexdump the superblock for analysis
>
> Original-patch-by: Pavol Gono <Pavol.Gono at siemens.com>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen at redhat.com>
Looks good to me. Based on Linus' message about the 3.0 release,
I'll hold this for 3.1 unless you really feel strongly it belongs
in 3.0.
Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <aelder at sgi.com>
> ---
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_fs.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_fs.h
> index 8f6fc1a..c13fed8 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_fs.h
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_fs.h
> @@ -249,6 +249,11 @@ typedef struct xfs_fsop_resblks {
> #define XFS_MAX_LOG_BYTES \
> ((2 * 1024 * 1024 * 1024ULL) - XFS_MIN_LOG_BYTES)
>
> +/* Used for sanity checks on superblock */
> +#define XFS_MAX_DBLOCKS(s) ((xfs_drfsbno_t)(s)->sb_agcount * (s)->sb_agblocks)
> +#define XFS_MIN_DBLOCKS(s) ((xfs_drfsbno_t)((s)->sb_agcount - 1) * \
> + (s)->sb_agblocks + XFS_MIN_AG_BLOCKS)
> +
> /*
> * Structures for XFS_IOC_FSGROWFSDATA, XFS_IOC_FSGROWFSLOG & XFS_IOC_FSGROWFSRT
> */
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c
> index bb3f9a7..a27dda6 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c
> @@ -348,7 +348,7 @@ xfs_mount_validate_sb(
> }
>
> /*
> - * More sanity checking. These were stolen directly from
> + * More sanity checking. Most of these were stolen directly from
> * xfs_repair.
> */
> if (unlikely(
> @@ -371,23 +371,13 @@ xfs_mount_validate_sb(
> (sbp->sb_blocklog - sbp->sb_inodelog != sbp->sb_inopblog) ||
> (sbp->sb_rextsize * sbp->sb_blocksize > XFS_MAX_RTEXTSIZE) ||
> (sbp->sb_rextsize * sbp->sb_blocksize < XFS_MIN_RTEXTSIZE) ||
> - (sbp->sb_imax_pct > 100 /* zero sb_imax_pct is valid */))) {
> + (sbp->sb_imax_pct > 100 /* zero sb_imax_pct is valid */) ||
> + sbp->sb_dblocks == 0 ||
> + sbp->sb_dblocks > XFS_MAX_DBLOCKS(sbp) ||
> + sbp->sb_dblocks < XFS_MIN_DBLOCKS(sbp))) {
> if (loud)
> - xfs_warn(mp, "SB sanity check 1 failed");
> - return XFS_ERROR(EFSCORRUPTED);
> - }
> -
> - /*
> - * Sanity check AG count, size fields against data size field
> - */
> - if (unlikely(
> - sbp->sb_dblocks == 0 ||
> - sbp->sb_dblocks >
> - (xfs_drfsbno_t)sbp->sb_agcount * sbp->sb_agblocks ||
> - sbp->sb_dblocks < (xfs_drfsbno_t)(sbp->sb_agcount - 1) *
> - sbp->sb_agblocks + XFS_MIN_AG_BLOCKS)) {
> - if (loud)
> - xfs_warn(mp, "SB sanity check 2 failed");
> + XFS_CORRUPTION_ERROR("SB sanity check failed",
> + XFS_ERRLEVEL_LOW, mp, sbp);
> return XFS_ERROR(EFSCORRUPTED);
> }
>
> @@ -864,7 +854,8 @@ xfs_update_alignment(xfs_mount_t *mp)
> if ((BBTOB(mp->m_dalign) & mp->m_blockmask) ||
> (BBTOB(mp->m_swidth) & mp->m_blockmask)) {
> if (mp->m_flags & XFS_MOUNT_RETERR) {
> - xfs_warn(mp, "alignment check 1 failed");
> + xfs_warn(mp, "alignment check failed: "
> + "(sunit/swidth vs. blocksize)");
> return XFS_ERROR(EINVAL);
> }
> mp->m_dalign = mp->m_swidth = 0;
> @@ -875,6 +866,8 @@ xfs_update_alignment(xfs_mount_t *mp)
> mp->m_dalign = XFS_BB_TO_FSBT(mp, mp->m_dalign);
> if (mp->m_dalign && (sbp->sb_agblocks % mp->m_dalign)) {
> if (mp->m_flags & XFS_MOUNT_RETERR) {
> + xfs_warn(mp, "alignment check failed: "
> + "(sunit/swidth vs. ag size)");
> return XFS_ERROR(EINVAL);
> }
> xfs_warn(mp,
> @@ -889,8 +882,8 @@ xfs_update_alignment(xfs_mount_t *mp)
> mp->m_swidth = XFS_BB_TO_FSBT(mp, mp->m_swidth);
> } else {
> if (mp->m_flags & XFS_MOUNT_RETERR) {
> - xfs_warn(mp,
> - "stripe alignment turned off: sunit(%d) less than bsize(%d)",
> + xfs_warn(mp, "alignment check failed: "
> + "sunit(%d) less than bsize(%d)",
> mp->m_dalign,
> mp->m_blockmask +1);
> return XFS_ERROR(EINVAL);
>
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs at oss.sgi.com
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
More information about the xfs
mailing list