2.6.38.4: xfs speed problem?

[Michael Monnerie]

[removed some recipients]

On Sonntag, 8. Mai 2011 Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> remake the fs on the above device with 'sw=16' or remount with 
> appropriate sunit and swidth values?

A remount wouldn't help the existing metadata layout. Would it be 
sufficient to remount with sw=16 and then create a top-level dir, 
wherein you recreate all existing dirs new, then hard-link each file and 
remove the old directory structure?
Or would it be needed to copy the files too to get advantage of the new 
sw?

-- 
mit freundlichen Grüssen,
Michael Monnerie, Ing. BSc

it-management Internet Services: Protéger
http://proteger.at [gesprochen: Prot-e-schee]
Tel: +43 660 / 415 6531

// ****** Radiointerview zum Thema Spam ******
// http://www.it-podcast.at/archiv.html#podcast-100716
// 
// Haus zu verkaufen: http://zmi.at/langegg/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://oss.sgi.com/pipermail/xfs/attachments/20110509/10ef8f18/attachment.sig>