XFS/Linux Sanity check

[Michael Monnerie]

On Dienstag, 3. Mai 2011 Dave Chinner wrote:
> > We're running Ubuntu 10.04 LTS, and have tried either the stock
> > kernel (2.6.32-30) or 2.6.35 from linux.org.
> 
> (OT: why do people install a desktop OS on their servers?)

I can only tell for us: We use openSUSE, and tried with SLES, but 
support on openSUSE is better despite you pay for SLES, and openSUSE is 
(by nature) newer in every package. And that gives you (nearly) actual 
XFS improvements due to newer kernels and therefore more performance 
(e.g. delaylog).

-- 
mit freundlichen Grüssen,
Michael Monnerie, Ing. BSc

it-management Internet Services: Protéger
http://proteger.at [gesprochen: Prot-e-schee]
Tel: +43 660 / 415 6531

// ****** Radiointerview zum Thema Spam ******
// http://www.it-podcast.at/archiv.html#podcast-100716
// 
// Haus zu verkaufen: http://zmi.at/langegg/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://oss.sgi.com/pipermail/xfs/attachments/20110503/6b3518f7/attachment.sig>