suse xfs patches

[Goldwyn Rodrigues]

On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 04:12:38PM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Hi Neil, hi Goldwyn,
> 
> if you find issue with XFS and commit local patches to the SLES tree
> it would be very much appreciated if you could actually send them
> upstream, including an explanation of what you are running into.
> 

Yes sure. I suppose you are refering to the patch attached.
I did not send it upstream because the upstream code had taken a
different approach and the patch was relevant to the SLES kernel
tree only.

FWIW, SGI was involved.

The upstream commits were 90810b9e82a36c3c57c1aeb8b2918b242a130b26 and
ff57ab21995a8636cfc72efeebb09cc6034d756f

-- 
Goldwyn
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: xfs-make-xfsbufd-less-aggressive.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 3119 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://oss.sgi.com/pipermail/xfs/attachments/20110614/11aa619c/attachment.patch>