Small files perform much faster on newly formatted fs?

Michael Monnerie michael.monnerie at is.it-management.at
Wed Jun 8 02:11:10 CDT 2011


On Dienstag, 7. Juni 2011 Norbert Veber wrote:
> 20 seconds vs 3+ minutes?!  The only difference I can see is
> lazy-count=1 and a larger agcount.  Sunit and swidth were also set
> automatically by mkfs this time.

Then retry mounting the old fs with sunit= and swidth= parameters. Are 
they on the same disks? What are your disks (number, kind)?

-- 
mit freundlichen Grüssen,
Michael Monnerie, Ing. BSc

it-management Internet Services: Protéger
http://proteger.at [gesprochen: Prot-e-schee]
Tel: +43 660 / 415 6531

// Haus zu verkaufen: http://zmi.at/langegg/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://oss.sgi.com/pipermail/xfs/attachments/20110608/63b4ee1e/attachment.sig>


More information about the xfs mailing list