Small files perform much faster on newly formatted fs?
Michael Monnerie
michael.monnerie at is.it-management.at
Wed Jun 8 02:11:10 CDT 2011
On Dienstag, 7. Juni 2011 Norbert Veber wrote:
> 20 seconds vs 3+ minutes?! The only difference I can see is
> lazy-count=1 and a larger agcount. Sunit and swidth were also set
> automatically by mkfs this time.
Then retry mounting the old fs with sunit= and swidth= parameters. Are
they on the same disks? What are your disks (number, kind)?
--
mit freundlichen Grüssen,
Michael Monnerie, Ing. BSc
it-management Internet Services: Protéger
http://proteger.at [gesprochen: Prot-e-schee]
Tel: +43 660 / 415 6531
// Haus zu verkaufen: http://zmi.at/langegg/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://oss.sgi.com/pipermail/xfs/attachments/20110608/63b4ee1e/attachment.sig>
More information about the xfs
mailing list