XFS: accounting of reclaimable inodes is incorrect

Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG s.priebe at profihost.ag
Tue Jun 7 08:48:38 CDT 2011


Am 07.06.2011 15:34, schrieb Christoph Hellwig:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 02:58:32PM +0200, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
> Linux 2.6.32 isn't really something supported by us.  It's not just a
> very old codebase, but also one where a lot of the XFS code was pretty
> much in flux.  If you want supported old releases work use one of
> the commercially supported one like RedHat or SuSE.
OK so my thought was totally wrong. I thought the longterm stable 
releases will still get bugfixed by SGI or whoever wrote the stuff. 
Sorry for that then. But what is then the idea of a longterm stable?

>> Redhat seems to have fixed it on it's own:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=642680
>
> I suspect the upstream commit you want is
> 081003fff467ea0e727f66d5d435b4f473a789b3, but I can't gurantee this
> actually applies to the 2.6.32 codebase.
No it doesn't. I already tried to implement it into current 2.6.32.41 code.

Greets Stefan




More information about the xfs mailing list