XFS causing stack overflow
Dave Chinner
david at fromorbit.com
Sun Dec 11 17:05:11 CST 2011
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 01:00:36AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > Where does the x86-64 do the interrupt stack switch?
>
> in entry_64.S
>
> >
> > I know the x86 32 bit interrupt handler switches to an irq/softirq
> > context stack, but the 64 bit one doesn't appear to. Indeed,
> > arch/x86/kernel/irq_{32,64}.c are very different, and only the 32
> > bit irq handler switches to another stack to process the
> > interrupts...
>
> x86-64 always used interrupt stacks and has used softirq stacks
> for a long time. 32bit got to it much later (the only good
> thing left from that 4k stack "experiment")
Oh, it's hidden in the "SAVE_ARGS_IRQ" macro.
But that happens before do_IRQ is called, so what is the do_IRQ call
chain doing on this stack given that we've already supposed to have
switched to the interrupt stack before do_IRQ is called?
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david at fromorbit.com
More information about the xfs
mailing list