[PATCH 2/2] xfs: kick inode writeback when low on memory
Christoph Hellwig
hch at infradead.org
Mon Apr 11 13:36:53 CDT 2011
How do you produce so many atime-dirty inodes? With relatime we
should have cut down on the requirement for those a lot.
Do you have traces that show if we're kicking off additional data
writeback this way too, or just pushing timestamp updates into
the AIL?
Either way the actual patch looks good,
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de>
More information about the xfs
mailing list