XFS Performance on NetApp

[Michael Monnerie]

Does anybody have a report how XFS behaves on a NetApp storage with thin 
provisioning? They have a completely "weird" storage, their WAFL (write 
anywhere file layout) together with deduplication and other things make 
me think the best is to not-at-all specify any "performance options" in 
mkfs/mount, like sunit/swidth or largeio, swalloc, etc.

Does someone have information on that?

-- 
mit freundlichen Grüssen,
Michael Monnerie, Ing. BSc

it-management Internet Services
http://proteger.at [gesprochen: Prot-e-schee]
Tel: 0660 / 415 65 31

****** Radiointerview zum Thema Spam ******
http://www.it-podcast.at/archiv.html#podcast-100716

// Wir haben im Moment zwei Häuser zu verkaufen:
// http://zmi.at/langegg/
// http://zmi.at/haus2009/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://oss.sgi.com/pipermail/xfs/attachments/20101027/2b04d44a/attachment.sig>