[PATCH] Xfstest 245: accept ENOTEMPTY as a valid error for the test
Josef Bacik
josef at redhat.com
Tue Nov 30 14:39:25 CST 2010
Testt 245 only checks to see if the rename returned EEXIST, but according to the
rename(2) manpage, ENOTEMPTY is also a valid result, which is in fact what Btrfs
returns. So just filter the output for ENOTEMPTY so that either EEXIST or
ENOTEMPTY will pass the test. It's not pretty I know, but I couldn't really
figure out a good way to get an either/or output to compare. With this fix
Btrfs now passes 245. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef at redhat.com>
---
245 | 10 +++++++++-
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
mode change 100644 => 100755 245
diff --git a/245 b/245
old mode 100644
new mode 100755
index 9c1cd3a..02b3173
--- a/245
+++ b/245
@@ -48,6 +48,14 @@ _cleanup()
rm -rf $dir
}
+# According to the rename(2) manpage you can get either EEXIST or ENOTEMPTY as an
+# error for trying to rename a non-empty directory, so just catch the error for
+# ENOTMEMPTY and replace it with the EEXIST output so that either result passes
+_filter_directory_not_empty()
+{
+ sed -e "s,Directory not empty,File exists,g"
+}
+
trap "_cleanup ; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15
@@ -59,7 +67,7 @@ touch $dir/aa/1
mkdir $dir/ab/aa
touch $dir/ab/aa/2
-mv $dir/ab/aa/ $dir 2>&1 | _filter_test_dir
+mv $dir/ab/aa/ $dir 2>&1 | _filter_test_dir | _filter_directory_not_empty
status=0
exit $status
--
1.6.6.1
More information about the xfs
mailing list