[PATCH] Xfsprogs: add fiemap command to xfs_io V2
Josef Bacik
josef at redhat.com
Thu Nov 18 02:25:53 CST 2010
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 04:10:29PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 12:19:34PM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote:
> > When trying to add a test for hole punching I noticed that the "bmap" command
> > only works on XFS, which makes testing hole punching on other fs's kind of
> > difficult. To fix this I've added an fiemap command that works almost exactly
> > like bmap. It is formatted similarly and takes similar flags, the only thing
> > thats different is obviously it doesn't spit out AG info and it doesn't make
> > finding prealloc space optional. This is my first foray into all of this stuff
> > so a good hard look would be appreciated. I tested it with a few different
> > files to make sure bmap and fiemap both looked the same. Thanks,
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef at redhat.com>
> > ---
> > V1->V2: add checks to make sure the system supports fiemap so xfsprogs builds on
> > things other than linux :).
> > +static void
> > +fiemap_help(void)
> > +{
> > + printf(_(
> > +"\n"
> > +" prints the block mapping for a file's data or attribute forks"
> > +"\n"
> > +" Example:\n"
> > +" 'bmap -vp' - tabular format verbose map, including unwritten extents\n"
>
> 'fiemap -vp' ?
>
> > +"\n"
> > +" bmap prints the map of disk blocks used by the current file.\n"
>
> fiemap prints...
>
> > +" The map lists each extent used by the file, as well as regions in the\n"
> > +" file that do not have any corresponding blocks (holes).\n"
> > +" By default, each line of the listing takes the following form:\n"
> > +" extent: [startoffset..endoffset]: startblock..endblock\n"
> > +" Holes are marked by replacing the startblock..endblock with 'hole'.\n"
> > +" All the file offsets and disk blocks are in units of 512-byte blocks.\n"
> > +" -a -- prints the attribute fork map instead of the data fork.\n"
> > +" -l -- also displays the length of each extent in 512-byte blocks.\n"
> > +" -n -- query n extents.\n"
> > +" -v -- Verbose information\n"
> > +" Note: the bmap for non-regular files can be obtained provided the file\n"
> > +" was opened appropriately (in particular, must be opened read-only).\n"
> > +"\n"));
>
> This last note about non-regular files is not true for fiemap,
> right?
>
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int
> > +numlen(
> > + __u64 val,
> > + int base)
> > +{
> > + __u64 tmp;
> > + int len;
> > +
> > + for (len = 0, tmp = val; tmp > 0; tmp = tmp/base)
> > + len++;
> > + return (len == 0 ? 1 : len);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void
> > +print_verbose(
> > + struct fiemap_extent *extent,
> > + int blocksize,
> > + int foff_w,
> > + int boff_w,
> > + int tot_w,
> > + int flg_w,
> > + int *cur_extent,
> > + __u64 *last_logical)
> > +{
> > + __u64 lstart;
> > + __u64 len;
> > + __u64 block;
> > + char lbuf[32];
> > + char bbuf[32];
>
> I don't think these two buffers are large enough to hold 2
> 64 bit integers as strings.
>
> > +static void
> > +print_plain(
> > + struct fiemap_extent *extent,
> > + int lflag,
> > + int blocksize,
> > + int *cur_extent,
> > + __u64 *last_logical)
> > +{
> > + __u64 lstart;
> > + __u64 block;
> > + __u64 len;
> > +
> > + lstart = extent->fe_logical / blocksize;
> > + len = extent->fe_length / blocksize;
> > + block = extent->fe_physical / blocksize;
> > +
> > + if (lstart != *last_logical) {
> > + printf("\t%d: [%llu..%llu]: hole", *cur_extent,
> > + *last_logical, lstart - 1LL);
> > + if (lflag)
> > + printf(_(" %llu blocks\n"),
> > + lstart - *last_logical);
> > + else
> > + printf("\n");
> > + (*cur_extent)++;
> > + }
> > +
> > + printf("\t%d: [%llu..%llu]: %llu..%llu", *cur_extent,
> > + lstart, lstart + len - 1LL, block,
> > + block + len - 1);
>
> Why the "1LL" here and not anywhere else?
>
> > +
> > + if (lflag)
> > + printf(_(" %llu blocks\n"), len);
> > + else
> > + printf("\n");
> > + (*cur_extent)++;
> > + *last_logical = lstart + len;
> > +}
> > +
> > +int
> > +fiemap_f(
> > + int argc,
> > + char **argv)
> > +{
> > + struct fiemap *fiemap;
> > + int num_extents = 32;
> > + int nflag = 0;
> > + int lflag = 0;
> > + int vflag = 0;
> > + int fiemap_flags = FIEMAP_FLAG_SYNC;
> > + int c;
> > + int i;
> > + int map_size;
> > + int ret;
> > + int cur_extent = 0;
> > + int foff_w = 16; /* 16 just for a good minimum range */
> > + int boff_w = 16;
> > + int tot_w = 5; /* 5 since its just one number */
> > + int flg_w = 5;
> > + __u64 blocksize = 512;
> > + __u64 last_logical = 0;
> > + struct stat st;
> > +
> > + while ((c = getopt(argc, argv, "aln:v")) != EOF) {
> > + switch (c) {
> > + case 'a':
> > + fiemap_flags |= FIEMAP_FLAG_XATTR;
> > + break;
> > + case 'l':
> > + lflag = 1;
> > + break;
> > + case 'n':
> > + num_extents = atoi(optarg);
> > + nflag = 1;
> > + break;
> > + case 'v':
> > + vflag++;
> > + break;
> > + default:
> > + return command_usage(&fiemap_cmd);
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + map_size = sizeof(struct fiemap) +
> > + (num_extents * sizeof(struct fiemap_extent));
>
> Need to validate num_extents before using it.
>
> > + fiemap = malloc(map_size);
> > + if (!fiemap) {
> > + fprintf(stderr, _("%s: malloc of %d bytes failed.\n"),
> > + progname, map_size);
> > + exitcode = 1;
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> > +
> > + memset(fiemap, 0, map_size);
> > + fiemap->fm_flags = fiemap_flags;
> > + fiemap->fm_length = -1;
> > + fiemap->fm_extent_count = nflag ? 0 : num_extents;
> > +
> > + ret = ioctl(file->fd, FS_IOC_FIEMAP, (unsigned long)fiemap);
> > + if (ret < 0) {
> > + fprintf(stderr, "%s: ioctl(FS_IOC_FIEMAP) [\"%s\"]: "
> > + "%s\n", progname, file->name, strerror(errno));
> > + free(fiemap);
> > + exitcode = 1;
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (!nflag) {
> > + if (fiemap->fm_mapped_extents > num_extents) {
> > + num_extents = fiemap->fm_mapped_extents;
> > + map_size = sizeof(struct fiemap) +
> > + (num_extents * sizeof(struct fiemap_extent));
> > + fiemap = realloc(fiemap, map_size);
> > + if (!fiemap) {
> > + fprintf(stderr, _("%s: realloc of %d bytes "
> > + "failed.\n"), progname,
> > + map_size);
> > + exitcode = 1;
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> > + }
> > + memset(fiemap, 0, map_size);
> > + fiemap->fm_flags = fiemap_flags;
> > + fiemap->fm_length = -1;
> > + fiemap->fm_extent_count = num_extents;
> > +
> > + ret = ioctl(file->fd, FS_IOC_FIEMAP, (unsigned long)fiemap);
> > + if (ret < 0) {
> > + fprintf(stderr, "%s: ioctl(FS_IOC_FIEMAP) [\"%s\"]: "
> > + "%s\n", progname, file->name, strerror(errno));
> > + free(fiemap);
> > + exitcode = 1;
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> > + }
>
> Hmmm. I'd prefer to see a loop mapping and printing N extents at a
> time rather than one massive allocation and hoping it fits in memory
> (think of a file with hundreds of thousands of extents). That's a
> problem with the existing xfs_bmap code - should we be duplicating
> that problem here?
>
Heh you know thats what I did before but decided it was better to do it the way
bmap did it. Thanks for the review, I'll fix all these things up,
Josef
More information about the xfs
mailing list