xfsprogs 2.x vs 3.x logsize changed
Michael Monnerie
michael.monnerie at is.it-management.at
Wed Nov 17 15:22:43 CST 2010
On Mittwoch, 17. November 2010 Łukasz Oleś wrote:
> Can I stay with the old log size or maybe there are some good reasons
> to use new values?
I believe the new defaults are there because it results in faster
metadata operations when there are lots of them. I'd guess if you only
ever have one writer it wouldn't matter much, but in case you have
several parallel writers it could make a difference. But I'm not a dev,
maybe they can confirm or clarify.
--
mit freundlichen Grüssen,
Michael Monnerie, Ing. BSc
it-management Internet Services: Protéger
http://proteger.at [gesprochen: Prot-e-schee]
Tel: +43 660 / 415 6531
// ****** Radiointerview zum Thema Spam ******
// http://www.it-podcast.at/archiv.html#podcast-100716
//
// Haus zu verkaufen: http://zmi.at/langegg/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://oss.sgi.com/pipermail/xfs/attachments/20101117/212d3ed5/attachment.sig>
More information about the xfs
mailing list