NOW: o_direct -- WAS: Re: WARNING in xfs_lwr.c, xfs_write()
Michael Monnerie
michael.monnerie at is.it-management.at
Thu May 27 06:05:09 CDT 2010
On Mittwoch, 26. Mai 2010 Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> My apologies for the newbish questions. If this has all been
> asked/answered before, please just point me to any papers that
> explain the pros/cons of o_direct. Thanks.
I'd recommend the kernel pages on http://lwn.net
From time to time you see the discussions about o_direct, always a
subject of discussion. I'm not a programmer so I don't care ;-)
--
mit freundlichen Grüssen,
Michael Monnerie, Ing. BSc
it-management Internet Services
http://proteger.at [gesprochen: Prot-e-schee]
Tel: 0660 / 415 65 31
// Wir haben im Moment zwei Häuser zu verkaufen:
// http://zmi.at/langegg/
// http://zmi.at/haus2009/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://oss.sgi.com/pipermail/xfs/attachments/20100527/5e96514c/attachment.sig>
More information about the xfs
mailing list