[PATCH 9/9] xfs: log ticket reservation underestimates the number of iclogs
Christoph Hellwig
hch at infradead.org
Mon Mar 15 10:41:54 CDT 2010
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 01:35:06PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> + * for LR headers - the space for data in an iclog is the size minus
> + * the space used for the headers. If we use the iclog size, then we
> + * undercalculate the number of headers required.
> + *
> + * Furthermore - the addition of op headers for split-recs might
> + * increase the space required enough to require more log and op
> + * headers, so take that into account too.
> + *
> + * IMPORTANT: This reservation makes the assumption that if this
> + * transaction is the first in an iclog and hence has the LR headers
> + * accounted to it, then the remaining space in the iclog is
> + * exclusively for this transaction. i.e. if the transaction is larger
> + * than the iclog, it will be the only thing in that iclog.
> + * Fundamentally, this means we must pass the entire log vector to
> + * xlog_write to guarantee this.
> + */
> + iclog_space = log->l_iclog_size - log->l_iclog_hsize;
> + num_headers = (unit_bytes + iclog_space - 1) / iclog_space;
> +
> + /* for split-recs - ophdrs added when data split over LRs */
> + unit_bytes += sizeof(xlog_op_header_t) * num_headers;
> +
> + /* add extra header reservations if we overrun */
> + while (!num_headers ||
> + ((unit_bytes + iclog_space - 1) / iclog_space) > num_headers) {
> + unit_bytes += sizeof(xlog_op_header_t);
> + num_headers++;
> + }
Looks good, but why do you check for a zero num_headers here? The only way
this could happen after the roundup above is if unit_bytes is zero, which
can't ever happen - one caller has it hardcoded to 1, and the the other
has a conditional for it beeing bigger than 0 around the call.
More information about the xfs
mailing list