[PATCH] xfstests: 223 - test file alignment on stripe geometry
Eric Sandeen
sandeen at sandeen.net
Sat Jan 30 10:13:45 CST 2010
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> +# real QA test starts here
>> +_supported_fs xfs ext4
>
> I'd make this generic and just do the notrun in scratch_mkfs_geom for
> non-supported filesystems.
fair enough
>> +scratch_mkfs_geom()
>> +{
>
> And I'd throw this one into common.rc.
ok
>> +=== Testing size 1073745920 falloc on 128k stripe ===
>> +SCRATCH_MNT/file-1073745920-falloc: well-aligned
>> diff --git a/common.rc b/common.rc
>> index 6424871..97513cc 100644
>> --- a/common.rc
>> +++ b/common.rc
>> @@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ _scratch_mkfs()
>> $MKFS_UDF_PROG $MKFS_OPTIONS $* $SCRATCH_DEV > /dev/null
>> ;;
>> *)
>> - /sbin/mkfs -t $FSTYP -- $MKFS_OPTIONS $* $SCRATCH_DEV > /dev/null
>> + /sbin/mkfs -t $FSTYP -- $MKFS_OPTIONS $* $SCRATCH_DEV
>
> Hmm, doesn't this change break other testcase? Anyway needs some
> rationale in the changelog.
didn't break anything for me; I wanted to be able to see the mkfs
results w/ geometry, is all. Will re-double-check but it was fine AFAIK.
>> index 0000000..fa005b2
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/src/fibmap.c
>
> This is a bit misnamed as it's not a generic fibmap tool but rather
> a specific tool comparing the bmap to the sunit alignment.
>
good point .. how about making it more generic, something like:
fibmap -o <file offset> -l <length> -s <stripe alignment> <filename>
hmm though I hate to reqwrite filefrag ... :)
I suppose something like this could go into xfs_io as well, but that
makes this test unavailable to the masses until another release, at least.
-Eric
More information about the xfs
mailing list