On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 02:15:27PM -0600, bpm at sgi.com wrote: > > Note that _xfs_log_force_lsn is new in the XFS tree, mainline still > > has _xfs_log_force with an lsn argument. > > I've been working with Bruce's tree. Not sure how best to handle that. Keep working against it for now, the merge fixup will be easy enough.