2.6.34-rc3: inode 0x401afe0 background reclaim flush failed with 11
Christian Kujau
lists at nerdbynature.de
Fri Apr 9 16:05:14 CDT 2010
Hi,
while running some filesystem benchmarks, this happend in my logs when
bonnie++ was running:
[14610.114155] Filesystem "md0": inode 0x401afe0 background reclaim flush failed with 11
[14610.114171] Filesystem "md0": inode 0x401afe1 background reclaim flush failed with 11
[14610.114183] Filesystem "md0": inode 0x401afe2 background reclaim flush failed with 11
[...]
...and so forth for a couple of inodes.
I can reproduce this pretty reliably with bonnie++ now. This did not
happen with 2.6.33, but the bonnie++ version has been upgraded too, so I'm
still not sure if this is a real regression.
I've put a few details on http://nerdbynature.de/bits/2.6.34-rc3/xfs/
Is this something to worry about?
Thanks,
Christian.
PS: Why is the inode shown in hex and not in decimal? Would something
like this do:
diff --git a/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.c b/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.c
index 05cd853..30c7bcb 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.c
@@ -825,7 +825,7 @@ xfs_reclaim_inode(
*/
if (error && !XFS_FORCED_SHUTDOWN(ip->i_mount)) {
xfs_fs_cmn_err(CE_WARN, ip->i_mount,
- "inode 0x%llx background reclaim flush failed with %d",
+ "inode 0x%llu background reclaim flush failed with %d",
(long long)ip->i_ino, error);
}
out:
[0] http://nerdbynature.de/benchmarks/v40z/2010-04-06/
--
BOFH excuse #329:
Server depressed, needs Prozac
More information about the xfs
mailing list