2.6.34-rc3: inode 0x401afe0 background reclaim flush failed with 11

Christian Kujau lists at nerdbynature.de
Fri Apr 9 16:05:14 CDT 2010


Hi,

while running some filesystem benchmarks, this happend in my logs when 
bonnie++ was running:

[14610.114155] Filesystem "md0": inode 0x401afe0 background reclaim flush failed with 11
[14610.114171] Filesystem "md0": inode 0x401afe1 background reclaim flush failed with 11
[14610.114183] Filesystem "md0": inode 0x401afe2 background reclaim flush failed with 11
[...]

...and so forth for a couple of inodes.

I can reproduce this pretty reliably with bonnie++ now. This did not 
happen with 2.6.33, but the bonnie++ version has been upgraded too, so I'm 
still not sure if this is a real regression.

I've put a few details on http://nerdbynature.de/bits/2.6.34-rc3/xfs/

Is this something to worry about?

Thanks,
Christian.

PS: Why is the inode shown in hex and not in decimal? Would something 
like this do:

diff --git a/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.c b/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.c
index 05cd853..30c7bcb 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.c
@@ -825,7 +825,7 @@ xfs_reclaim_inode(
 	 */
 	if (error && !XFS_FORCED_SHUTDOWN(ip->i_mount)) {
 		xfs_fs_cmn_err(CE_WARN, ip->i_mount,
-			"inode 0x%llx background reclaim flush failed with %d",
+			"inode 0x%llu background reclaim flush failed with %d",
 			(long long)ip->i_ino, error);
 	}
 out:


[0] http://nerdbynature.de/benchmarks/v40z/2010-04-06/
-- 
BOFH excuse #329:

Server depressed, needs Prozac




More information about the xfs mailing list